🗣 Culture War as Distraction: What’s Being Lost After Charlie Kirk’s Murder 📰

Posted: September 19, 2025 in Anarchy Journal Constitutional
Tags: , , , , , , ,
0

We’ve just been through another moment: Charlie Kirk dead, an American provocateur murdered during a public event.

Immediately, the gears of outrage, social media spectacle, and moral posturing started turning. But underneath the noise, ask yourself: how much of what’s going on is politics as usual? And how much is a vivid distraction from what really holds power in this country?

“If I see a Black pilot, I’m going to be like, boy, I hope he’s qualified.” — The Charlie Kirk Show, January 23, 2024 The Guardian

The Spectacle & Response

If you scroll through social media or listen to pundits, a few things become crystal:

  • Charlie Kirk has been more than “just another right-wing podcaster”; for many on the Right, he is being elevated to martyr, symbol, hero. This is intentional. It fuels identity, animus, and grievance.
  • Meanwhile, the Left is also practicing its version of virtue displays: denunciations, calls for “free speech,” arguments over who is more morally responsible. Sometimes these are sincere; often they are performative.

Then there’s the machinery of suppression/support. Jimmy Kimmel gets pulled off the air indefinitely for his remarks about the killing. Platforms scramble. Lawmakers issue statements. Some people are fired, suspended, disowned for social media posts judged too flippant, too critical, too celebratory (or even just insufficiently mournful).

“You will never live in a society when you have an armed citizenry and you won’t have a single gun death. That is nonsense. It’s drivel. But I am — I think it’s worth it.” — Charlie Kirk

Lost in the Frenzy: What Actually Matters

While we lock into tribal alignment over “Is X more to blame?” or “Did Y censor free speech?”, real decisions continue to be made elsewhere—decisions that hurt or help ordinary lives.

  • Income inequality: Since 1980, the bottom 90% of U.S. earners have seen incomes rise ~36%, while the top 1% shot up ~162% and the top 0.1% exploded by ~301%.
  • Wage stagnation: Median weekly earnings for full-time workers in mid-2025 are ~$1,196. For women, it’s ~$1,078. Adjusted for inflation, most wages haven’t moved much in decades.
  • Medical debt: 40% of adults report bills they can’t pay. Roughly 20 million Americans owe medical debt, totaling at least $220 billion.
  • Bankruptcies: 2024 saw over 517,000 filings, up 14% from the year before. Medical bills remain a top driver.
  • Life expectancy: Americans in the wealthiest counties live about 7–10 years longer than those in the poorest. Poverty literally shortens life.

These are not abstractions. They are the ground we stand on, and they’re being ignored while we fight over who disrespected whose memory.

“Happening all the time in urban America, prowling Blacks go around for fun to go target white people, that’s a fact. It’s happening more and more.” — The Charlie Kirk Show, May 19, 2023 The Guardian

The Trap of Left vs Right

This is the pattern: tragedy or provocation → political polarization → spectacle → distraction. And the Left vs Right framing helps elites on both sides:

  • Right-wing media gets a martyr, a rallying cry, an excuse to push further culture war rhetoric.
  • Left-wing media and centrist commentators get to critique, outraged, safe inside their media bubbles, while pointing fingers.
  • Neither side is forced to substantially challenge the power structures: the economic inequality, corporate control of media, tech platform power, the role of political money.

““Keep America free … You should be allowed to say outrageous things … There’s ugly speech. There’s gross speech. There’s evil speech. And all of it’s protected by the First Amendment.” — earlier in 2025, in remarks pushing back against limits on free speech. The Santa Barbara Independent

Class War, Not Culture War

Here’s what we lose when class war is displaced:

  • People who could be allies don’t realize their shared stakes. Someone working a low-wage job and voting for the Right may still suffer under the same rent inflation, the same healthcare inaccessibility as someone voting for the Left. But because symbols and culture dominate, they are told to hate each other instead.
  • Policies that could improve life—universal health care, affordable housing, stronger unions, more equitable taxation, campaign finance reform—are sidelined as too “political” or unsexy amid culture war spectacle.
  • Elites (corporations, wealthy donors, political insiders, media conglomerates) are mostly unaffected by the noise. Their power increases because scandal, outrage, fear allow for more regulation of dissent (or selective enforcement), more control over narrative, and more justification for reinforcing the “security” apparatus.

“America was at its peak when we halted immigration for 40 years and we dropped our foreign-born percentage to its lowest level ever. We should be unafraid to do that.” — The Charlie Kirk Show, August 22, 2025 The Guardian

What We Should Be Looking Up At

If we want to shift the ground, here’s what it means to look up not sideways:

  • Hold powerful institutions accountable: Big tech, media conglomerates, regulatory agencies, secret lobbying networks.
  • Shift public focus to material conditions: how many people cannot afford medical care; how many are one paycheck from eviction; how wealth is concentrated.
  • Build movements oriented around economic justice, not just identity or ideology. Worker organizing, co-ops, mutual aid, housing justice.
  • Demolish or weaken the structures that enforce class inequality: tax loopholes, corporate welfare, deregulated finance, and campaign finance that amplifies elite voices.

“If we would have said that Joy Reid and Michelle Obama and Sheila Jackson Lee and Ketanji Brown Jackson were affirmative action picks, we would have been called racists. Now they’re coming out and they’re saying it for us … You do not have the brain processing power to otherwise be taken really seriously. You had to go steal a white person’s slot to go be taken somewhat seriously.” — The Charlie Kirk Show, July 13, 2023 The Guardian

Defend free speech. Don’t confuse theater with truth. Don’t let the spectacle steal the stage from power.

Culture war is a powerful machine. It divides communities, drains energy into rage, and channels anger toward the wrong targets—often toward each other. Meanwhile, the people who really control the levers of economic power, of media control, of policy-making, carry on largely unchallenged.

The class war may not feel dramatic; it may feel slower, like moving tectonic plates. But its consequences are far deeper and more pervasive than the latest outrage.

And if we don’t shift our attention, the cycle will keep repeating: event → sides drawn up → outraged tweets and show cancellations → temporary appeasement → next event. Without meaningful structural change, nothing really gets better for most people.

📱 When Our Phones Watch Us: Palantir and the Panopticon We Didn’t Elect 👁

Posted: September 13, 2025 in Anarchy Journal Constitutional
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
0

“It isn’t ‘They’re spying on me through my phone’ anymore. Eventually, it will be ‘My phone is spying on me.’” That warning from Philip K. Dick captures the slope Palantir is already halfway down—turning citizens into data points, and autonomy into algorithmic obedience (Goodreads).

As Edward Snowden put it, “Under observation, we act less free, which means we effectively are less free” (Goodreads). That’s the business Palantir is in: surveillance disguised as efficiency, control dressed up as analytics.

This isn’t theory. Palantir already fuels ICE raids, predictive policing, corporate risk dashboards, and battlefield logistics in Ukraine (IBANet). As Thor Benson reminds us, “Don’t oppose mass surveillance for your own sake. Oppose it for the activists, lawyers, journalists and all of the other people our liberty relies on” (Ammo.com).

Palantir isn’t just selling software. It’s selling obedience. And like all Silicon Valley myths, it started with a story about “innovation” that hid something darker.

Origins & Power Connections

Founded in 2003 by Peter Thiel, Alex Karp, Joe Lonsdale, and Stephen Cohen (Wikipedia), Palantir wasn’t born in a garage—it was born in Langley’s shadow. Early funding came from In-Q-Tel, the CIA’s venture arm (DCF Modeling). When your first investors are spymasters, your product isn’t disruption. It’s surveillance.

Its flagship platform, Gotham, was built hand-in-glove with U.S. intelligence agencies. Palantir engineers embedded inside government offices stitched together oceans of data: phone records, bank transactions, social media posts, warzone intel (EnvZone). Palantir didn’t just sell a tool; it sold itself into the bloodstream of the national security state.

By the time it was worth billions, Palantir was indispensable to the U.S. war machine. Its software was used in Afghanistan and Iraq (SETA Foundation), where surveillance wasn’t a civil liberties debate but a weapon of war. When those tools came home to American cities, they carried the same battlefield logic: control first, questions never.

Domestic Impact: Policing & Immigration

Palantir’s second act was on U.S. streets. Its predictive policing contracts in Los Angeles, New Orleans, and beyond promised crime prevention through data. In reality, biased arrest records fed the machine, and the machine spit bias back out dressed as math (SETA Foundation).

Shoshana Zuboff warned: “Surveillance is the path to profit that overrides ‘we the people,’ taking our decision rights without permission and even when we say ‘no’” (Goodreads). Prediction isn’t neutral—it’s a form of control.

Immigration enforcement sharpened that control. Palantir built ImmigrationOS for ICE, consolidating visa files, home addresses, social media posts, and more (American Immigration Council). Critics call it “deportation by algorithm.” In Palantir’s language, that’s “efficiency.” The human cost is invisible in the spreadsheet.

A traffic stop can spiral into deportation. A visa application can flag someone as “high risk” with no explanation. Entire neighborhoods live under digital suspicion. And when protests erupted against these tools, six activists were arrested outside Palantir’s New York office in 2025 (The Guardian).

Palantir insists it only “builds the tools.” But when those tools fracture families and criminalize communities, the line between code and consequence vanishes.

Global Expansion: From Battlefields to Boardrooms

War proved Palantir’s business case. In Afghanistan and Iraq, its engineers sat beside soldiers, mapping bomb patterns and insurgent networks with data fusion software (SETA Foundation). The Pentagon called it a breakthrough. Critics called it privatized intelligence.

Now, Ukraine is Palantir’s showcase. Its tools analyze satellite imagery, coordinate battlefield logistics, and even gather evidence of war crimes (IBANet). CEO Alex Karp boasts Ukraine is a “tech-forward war.” But once normalized on the front lines, surveillance rarely stays in the trenches.

And Palantir’s reach doesn’t stop at war. Its Foundry platform runs inside JPMorgan, Airbus, Merck, and Fiat Chrysler (Wikipedia). What began as battlefield software is now a corporate dashboard—tracking supply chains, financial risks, and consumer behavior. The architecture is the same: consolidate data, predict outcomes, reduce uncertainty. Only the labels change.

Surveillance Capitalism & The Future

Jeremy Bentham’s Panopticon imagined a prison where one guard could watch every inmate without them knowing when they were being watched. “Visible: the inmate will constantly have before his eyes the tall outline of the central tower… Unverifiable: the inmate must never know whether he is being looked at” (Farnam Street). It was a theory then. Palantir has built it for real—and scaled it to entire societies.

Zuboff called surveillance capitalism a regime that reshapes human behavior for profit (Yale Law Journal). Palantir goes further, reshaping governance itself. Its platforms don’t just analyze data; they dictate institutional behavior, target populations, and define acceptable outcomes. The architecture dictates the politics.

Glenn Greenwald cut to the core: “The mere existence of a mass surveillance apparatus, regardless of how it is used, is in itself sufficient to stifle dissent” (Goodreads). That stifling doesn’t make headlines. It happens in silence—when a protest isn’t planned, when a whistleblower doesn’t speak, when communities live in quiet fear of an algorithm they can’t see.

And that’s why Benson’s warning should stick: “Don’t oppose mass surveillance for your own sake. Oppose it for the activists, lawyers, journalists, and all of the other people our liberty relies on” (Ammo.com). Because the weight of Palantir’s code doesn’t fall evenly. It presses hardest on those who dare to resist.

Orwell said it plainly: “Big Brother is watching you.” The 21st-century twist is worse. Big Brother has been privatized, optimized, and sold at a markup (The Guardian).

Truth Over Tribalism

Follow anarchyroll:

Wisdom Is Resistance

When the Path Loops Back

Posted: September 9, 2025 in Stimulus Space Response
Tags: , , , , , , ,
0

When Ego Poses as Progress

“It is impossible for a man to learn what he thinks he already knows.” — Epictetus

There’s a trap hidden inside progress: ego. It convinces us that a small victory is the end of the road. We meditate for a few days, journal for a week, resist anger once, and assume we’ve outgrown our old selves. The ego, ever clever, disguises pride as peace and comfort as growth.

But real growth is humble. It doesn’t parade. It continues quietly when no one is watching. Stoicism reminds us to stay grounded in process, not outcomes.

When we think we’ve “arrived,” we often stop doing the very practices that helped us make progress in the first place. That’s when we slide — not because we’ve failed, but because we’ve stopped paying attention.

In Buddhism, the same warning shows up in the cycle of craving and aversion. We crave success. We avoid discomfort. And those reactions can drag us backward even while we think we’re moving forward.

The Loop of Craving, Clinging, and Collapse

“You only lose what you cling to.” — Buddha

In Buddhist thought, suffering is born from clinging. We cling to progress, to feeling good, to staying motivated. When that feeling slips — because it always will — we resist. We call it laziness, backsliding, failure. But in truth, it’s just another turn of the wheel.

Falling back into old habits doesn’t mean we’re broken. It means we’re alive. The path isn’t straight — it’s circular. The work is in noticing when we’ve wandered, and gently guiding ourselves back.

Where Buddhism teaches us to notice and redirect, Taoism invites us to release altogether. It echoes this return not with instruction, but surrender.

Photo by Clay Banks on Unsplash

Flow Over Force

“Nature does not hurry, yet everything is accomplished.” — Lao Tzu

Taoism teaches that struggle often slows us down. We force progress with guilt, pressure, and shame. But flow — the true kind — is effortless. Not lazy, not passive, but aligned. When we move with the current instead of thrashing against it, life moves with us.

Progress isn’t always action. Sometimes it’s rest. Sometimes it’s the decision not to give up. In the Tao, stillness is not a setback — it’s a season. We forget this when we measure ourselves only by how fast or far we move.

Still, even when we trust the current, we’re swimming with a brain wired for old patterns. And once we understand how the brain resists change, we face the deeper challenge: choosing change anyway.

Biology Isn’t Destiny

“Neurons that fire together, wire together.” — Hebb’s Rule

Every old habit has a neural trail. The brain, designed for efficiency, defaults to what it knows, especially under pressure. When stress hits, we go back to autopilot. That might look like procrastination, self-doubt, or retreating from challenges.

But there’s no moral failure here. Just biology. The good news? Biology can change. When we choose new patterns — again and again — we start rewiring our reflexes. Not instantly. Not perfectly. But gradually. That’s the work.

Neuroscience gives us grace. It reminds us that missteps are not proof we’re doomed. They’re proof that our brains are following their training. And if we can train them once, we can train them again.

And to keep showing up for that work — again and again — we need to believe we’re worth the effort. Even when we fall short.

Photo by Harli Marten on Unsplash

Becoming Human On Purpose

“The curious paradox is that when I accept myself just as I am, then I can change.” — Carl Rogers

Humanist personal development starts with compassion. It isn’t about hacking our habits or becoming productivity machines. It’s about remembering we are people. Messy, brilliant, imperfect people. And we grow best in environments where we feel safe — not shamed.

We think self-criticism keeps us sharp. But often, it just keeps us scared. True accountability starts with honesty, not hostility. We can fall off without falling apart.

Forgiveness isn’t letting ourselves off the hook. It’s giving ourselves a hand backup. It’s choosing to keep going instead of giving up. Progress is possible — not through perfection, but through patience.

Closing Thoughts: Keep Going

Hope isn’t naïve. It’s necessary. Especially when we’ve stumbled, when our patterns feel unbreakable, when the voice in our head says we’ll never change. It’s easy to confuse rest with surrender, or to believe that one setback means we’re back at zero.

But we’re never at zero. Every breath, every choice, every moment we show up again builds something. This isn’t about hustle. It’s not about proving anything to anyone. It’s about building a reality that sustains us — from the inside out.

Whether we work with our hands or our minds, whether we’re exhausted or just starting, the path forward remains the same: one small, honest, imperfect step at a time. Not with shame. Not with panic. But with presence. With self-compassion. And with the quiet discipline to keep going.

🌐 The Climate Shock Doctrine 🔥

Posted: September 2, 2025 in Frackishima
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
0

How disaster capitalism thrives in the age of climate chaos

Disaster as a Business Model

Hurricanes rip coastlines apart, wildfires reduce neighborhoods to ash, floods drown farmlands. Each new disaster is framed as a natural tragedy—yet behind the smoke, someone always finds a way to profit.

Swiss RE reports climate disasters are already costing the U.S. 0.4% of GDP annually, with every dollar of adaptation saving eleven in avoided damages【time.com】. But adaptation isn’t what elites are betting on. Instead, they see chaos as an opportunity.

As American Studies scholar Kevin Rozario puts it:

“The human component is a massive accelerant to the fires.”【smith.edu】

The accelerant isn’t just carbon—it’s capitalism itself.

The Pattern of Profit

When a climate disaster strikes, everyday people lose homes, livelihoods, and loved ones. Meanwhile, corporations cash in.

In the insurance sector, even a catastrophe doesn’t halt profits. The Financial Times reports that despite massive underwriting losses, insurers are hiking premiums and retreating from high-risk zones, and “investors are rewarding them for becoming increasingly selective in the coverage they offer.”【ft.com】

In 2024, global disaster losses hit $320 billion. Only $140 billion was insured, leaving $180 billion uninsured, shifted onto individuals and taxpayers【thinklandscape.globallandscapesforum.org】.

Kay Young, a 63-year-old survivor of the Los Angeles wildfires, summed up the fight ordinary people face:

“They’re not going to give you the value of your house … if they do, you really have to fight for it.”【reuters.com】

The Shock Doctrine Playbook

This cycle is not an accident—it’s a strategy.

Naomi Klein’s Shock Doctrine laid it bare: disasters create a “shock window” in which elites exploit public disorientation to push radical privatization. The American Bar Association defines disaster capitalism as:

“Exploitation of natural or man-made disasters in service of capitalist interests.”【americanbar.org】

We’ve seen it after wars, coups, and financial crashes. Now, the same playbook drives climate response.

Wildfires & the Land Grab Economy

Few examples show this more clearly than California’s wildfires. In Malibu, where entire neighborhoods burned, wealthy investors swooped in. The Times reports lots reduced to rubble were resold for up to $7.5 million, raising “troubling questions about gentrification in the wake of climate-related disasters.”【thetimes.co.uk】

Governor Newsom eventually issued an order barring unsolicited offers from speculators preying on survivors—some of whom were approached while their houses were still burning【gov.ca.gov】. But the vultures had already circled.

Stephen Pyne, the historian of fire, describes this era as the Pyrocene:

Humanity’s combustion—fossil fuel and ecological disruption—has created a fire-dominated epoch.

In other words, we lit the match. Now, profiteers are selling the ashes.

Who Pays the Price

Communities most vulnerable to climate chaos are the ones paying the heaviest price. In developing nations, most disaster losses are uninsured. In the U.S., low-income and marginalized neighborhoods bear the brunt of heat waves, toxic smoke, and flooding.

Scholars writing in Global Environmental Change warn:

“Climate-induced disasters deepen inequality and social vulnerability, disproportionately harming marginalized communities.”【sciencedirect.com】

Meanwhile, wealth insulates the few: billionaires hire private firefighters, build fortified compounds, or buy real estate on higher ground. The rest of us scrape together GoFundMe donations.

Who Cashes In

The winners of this game are clear:

  • Insurance companies post record profits even as payouts shrink【greenmoney.com】.
  • Wall Street invents catastrophe bonds, letting investors bet on disasters.
  • Developers flip ruined communities into luxury zones.
  • Corporations snap up FEMA contracts.

The Allianz Group—hardly a radical source—warned bluntly that at 3°C of warming, damage will be impossible to adapt to or insure against, threatening the foundations of capitalism itself【theguardian.com】. Even the system’s architects know it’s unsustainable.

Resistance Against the Shock Doctrine

When fire levels a community, it should be a moment of collective rebuilding. Instead, it’s too often a handoff: loss for the many, leverage for the few.

As Vanity Fair reported from wildfire-stricken California:

“Profiteers and misinformation have exacerbated the distress of the affected … community members … are concerned about future rebuilding efforts potentially displacing them.”【vanityfair.com】

This is the heart of the Climate Shock Doctrine: the transformation of catastrophe into capital.

The fight for climate justice is not just ecological—it’s economic. We can’t stop disasters from striking, but we can decide who owns the recovery. That means:

  • Public ownership of critical resources.
  • Investments in resilience for poor communities first.
  • Grassroots solidarity networks that sidestep corporate vultures.
  • Cutting off financial pipelines to fossil fuels—the “oxygen on which the fire of global warming burns”【newyorker.com】.

Because if disaster capitalism keeps winning, we’re not just burning forests—we’re torching the future.

☯ Wisdom is Resistance. Truth Over Tribalism. ∞

🏥 The Mental Health Crisis They Created 🏦

Posted: August 26, 2025 in Anarchy Journal Constitutional
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,
0

The system breaks us, then sells us pills.

They tell us it’s a personal failing. That anxiety is a chemical imbalance. That depression is a genetic curse. That burnout is solved with resilience. But look around: the conditions that feed this crisis are man-made.

“Doctors … argue that chronic stress, stemming from social problems such as financial distress, racism, and poor working conditions, is a key driver of mental health issues.” — The Guardian

We work longer hours for less pay. We doomscroll through endless cycles of bad news and empty distraction. We spend more time isolated in front of glowing screens than in human connection. The pressure is relentless—engineered to keep us consuming, competing, and collapsing.

“About one in four American adults suffers from a diagnosable mental disorder in a given year, and one in ten will suffer from a depressive illness, such as major depression or bipolar disorder.” — Johns Hopkins–derived data

And just when we break, they offer us a fix. Not by changing the system—but by medicalizing our despair. Big Pharma has turned misery into a trillion-dollar market. Antidepressant prescriptions keep climbing. ADHD meds are at record highs. Anti-anxiety pills sell like candy. And yet, rates of suicide, loneliness, and mental illness are higher than ever.

“In 2020, 20.3% of adults had received any mental-health treatment in the past 12 months, including 16.5% who had taken prescription medication for their mental health.” — CDC

“Today, a full fourth of U.S. women are on antidepressants.” — KevinMD / Harvard Health

This isn’t healing—it’s management. Profitable management. The more the machine grinds us down, the more pills they can sell us to function well enough to keep serving the machine. It’s a cycle of extraction: from our labor, our attention, and now our very psychology.

“The monthly antidepressant dispensing rate for females ages 12–17 surged 129.6% from March 2020 onward compared with beforehand.” — University of Michigan study in Pediatrics

None of this denies that meds can help. But let’s be clear: the crisis isn’t random. It’s not just “in our heads.” It’s the direct product of an economy built on overwork, digital isolation, and engineered anxiety. A society where meaning is stripped down to productivity, and hope is marketed back to us in capsules.

“Despite a significant rise in mental-health awareness and treatment … mental-health conditions are worsening. Suicide rates have increased by 30% since 2000, and nearly one-third of adults report symptoms of depression or anxiety.” — Time

“Between 1999 and 2022, antidepressant-related overdose deaths climbed; in 2022, there were 5,863 overdoses—comparable to heroin overdose deaths that same year.” — The Guardian

The mental health crisis wasn’t an accident. It was manufactured. And the ones cashing in are the same ones who built the conditions that broke us.

Wisdom is Resistance. Truth Over Tribalism.

Older Entries
Newer Entries